ANALYTICAL METHOD VERIFICATION PROTOCOL OF ENANTIOMERIC PURITY OF NAPROXEN Ph. Eur.
Superseded Protocol No. | Nil |
Effective Date |
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
Sr. No. | Subject | Page No. |
Protocol Approval | ||
Objective | ||
Scope | ||
Responsibility of validation team | ||
Product profile | ||
Methodology | ||
Verification parameters | ||
Incident/Deviation | ||
Summary/Final conclusion/Recommendation | ||
Abbreviation | ||
Revision History |
- Protocol Approval :
Prepared By:
Functional Area | Name | Designation | Signature/ Date |
Quality Control |
Reviewed By:
Functional Area | Name | Designation | Signature/Date |
Quality Assurance | |||
Head Quality Control |
Approved By:
Functional Area | Name | Designation | Signature/Date |
Head QA |
- Objective:
The objective of this verification is to provide documentary evidence that analytical methodology used for enantiomeric purity of Naproxen Ph. Eur. by pharmacopeia method is consistent and to provide the reliable results within the predetermined acceptance criteria.
Analytical method verification will be performed by considering thefollowing parameters:
Parameters | Naproxen Ph. Eur. |
Specificity | yes |
Precision | |
System Precision | yes |
Method Precision | yes |
Intermediate Precision (Ruggedness) | yes |
System Suitability | yes |
- Scope :
The scope of this protocol is applicable for the verification of method of analysis of enantiomeric purity of Naproxen Ph. Eur.
- Responsibility of Validation Team:
Departments | Responsibilities |
QC | Preparation & Review of Protocol. |
Analysis of samples and recording of data. | |
Compilation and checking of data | |
Preparation of Summary Report. | |
To impart training of protocol to concerned department/persons. | |
QA | Review of protocol. |
Co-ordination with QC to carryout Verification. | |
Review of data and summary report. | |
Head QA | Approval of Protocol |
- Product Profile:
Category | Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) |
Reason for Verification | 1st verification |
Active Ingredient | Naproxen Ph. Eur. |
Method Reference | |
Specification Limits | Related substance Impurity G : NMT – 2.5% |
- Methodology:
Reagent:
Table 1.0: Chemicals/ Reagents
Sr. No. | Reagent | Grade |
1. | Glacial Acetic acid | HPLC Grade |
2. | Acetonitrile | HPLC Grade |
3. | 2-Propanol | HPLC Grade |
4. | Hexane | HPLC Grade |
5. | Tetrahydrofuran | HPLC Grade |
Precaution to be taken during conversion from reverse phase to normal phase and vice versa:
Degasser must be off during analysis. Glassware should be dried before use and there shall be no contamination of water. HPLC System shall be purge with methanol thoroughly to remove water content present in HPLC. Further system flushing shall be performed as mention below.
Table 2.0 : HPLC System saturation to Normal Phase
Sr. No. | Solvent | Flow Rate | Flushing Time |
Methanol | 2.0 ml | A : 1 hour, B : 1 hour, C : 1 hour, D : 1 hour | |
2-Propanol | 1.0 ml | Overnight flushing & Port ratio shall be A : 25 %, B : 25 %, C : 25 %, D : 25 % | |
Hexane | 1.0 ml | A : 30 minutes , B : 30 minutes | |
Mobile Phase | 1.0 ml | A : 30 minutes |
Above given system flushing is limited to this verification activity. After system flushing attached column and saturate with mobile phase till the constant back pressure (Min: 15min)
Liquid chromatography:
Protect solutions from light
Test solution:
Dissolve 25.0 mg of the substance to be examined in tetrahydrofuran R and dilute to 50.0 ml with the same solvent. Dilute 2.0 ml of the solution to 20.0 ml with the mobile phase.
Reference solution (a):
Dilute 2.5 ml of the test solution to 100.0 ml with the mobile phase.
Reference solution (b):
Dissolve 5 mg of racemic naproxen CRS in 10.0 ml of tetrahydrofuran R and dilute to 100.0 ml with the mobile phase.
Column:
Size: L = 0.25 m, φ = 4.6 mm;
Stationary phase: Silica gel π-acceptor/π-donor for chiral separations R (5 µm) (S,S);
Temperature: 25°C
Mobile phase:
Glacial acetic Acid R, Acetonitrile R, 2-propanol R, hexane R (0.5:5:10:84.5 v/v/v/v)
Flow rate: 2 ml/min
Detection: Spectrophotometer at 263 nm
Injection: 20 µl
Run time: 1.5 times the retention time of naproxen
(Retention time = about 5 min)
System suitability: Reference solution (b):
Resolution: minimum 3 between the peaks due to Impurity G and Naproxen.
- Verification parameters:
The following parameters to be perform for the verification activity.
- Specificity
- Precision
- System Suitability
- Specificity:
Specificity of analytical method is its ability to assess unequivocally the analyte in presence of components that may be expected to be present in the diluent.
Specificity of test method should be established by separately injecting blank solution (diluent), resolution solution, identification solution of impurities, spike test solution with impurities shall be prepared as per specification limit level and test solution. Test solution shall be prepared as per method of analysis.
Blank: Diluent
Preparation of Identification solution:
Stock solution of Impurity G:
Weigh accurately about 2.5 mg of Impurity G and transferred to 50 ml volumetric flask. Dissolve and dilute to volume with tetrahydrofuran, mix. Further dilute 5 ml of this solution to 50 ml with mobile phase and mix.
Identification solution of Impurity G:
Dilute 5.0 ml of stock solution of impurity G to 20.0 ml with diluent, mix.
Reference solution (a):
Dilute 2.5 ml of the test solution to 100.0 ml with the mobile phase.
Reference solution (b):
Dissolve 5 mg of racemic naproxen CRS in 10.0 ml of tetrahydrofuran R and dilute to 100.0 ml with the mobile phase.
Note: Impurity weight can be reduce to achieve the final concentration same.
Test solution:
Dissolve 25.0 mg of the substance to be examined in tetrahydrofuran R and dilute to 50.0 ml with the same solvent. Dilute 2.0 ml of the solution to 20.0 ml with the mobile phase.
Spike test solution:
Dissolve 25.0 mg of the substance to be examined in tetrahydrofuran R, and dilute to 50.0 ml with the same solvent. Further pipette 2.0 ml of the solution to 20 ml of volumetric flask and dissolve in mobile phase. Also spike 5 ml of stock solution of impurity G in this solution before make up and mix.
Procedure: Inject the preparation of blank solution (mobile phase), reference solution (a) reference solution (b) and identification solution of impurity G, test solution and spike test solution on a HPLC system with a Diode array detector (DAD) as follows in table 2.0. Determine the purity of the individual peaks of interest. Record the retention times and check for system suitability parameters. Obtained specificity data shall be reported in tabular manner with reference of table 4.0 and 5.0.
Table 3.0: Sequence
Solutions | No of Injection to be injected in Sequence |
Blank solution | 1 |
Resolution solution (b) | 1 |
Resolution solution (a) | 6 |
Identification solution of Impurity G | 1 |
Test solution | 1 |
Spike test solution | 1 |
Blank (to avoid carry over) | 1 |
Resolution solution (a)_Bkt | 1 |
Table 4.0 Spiked test solution
Sr. No. | Sample | RT (min.) | RRT | Peak purity |
Blank | NA | |||
Naproxen | ||||
Impurity G |
Acceptance Criteria:
- There should be no interference of the diluent, impurity at the retention time of Analyte peak.
- Impurity peaks should be well resolved from active peak and each other.
- Analyte
peak and known impurity peak in identification solution, spiked sample solution
should be spectrally pure.
- Precision:
- System Precision:
- Precision:
The system precision is the closeness of agreement between the responses of detector. It is usually expressed as the standard deviation (SD) or the relative standard deviation (RSD).
Standard solution will be prepared as per method of analysis and six replicate injections to be injected in sequence and recorded the area response of main Analyte peak and calculate the % RSD for Area and Retention time of main analyte peak.
Table 5.0 System Precision- Repeatability of Standard Injections
Sr. No. | Naproxen | |
Peak Area | Retention time (min.) | |
1 | ||
2 | ||
3 | ||
4 | ||
5 | ||
6 | ||
Mean | ||
SD | ||
% RSD |
Acceptance Criteria:
% RSD for peak area and retention time of naproxen in six replicate injection of reference solution (a) should be NMT 5.0 % and 1.0 % respectively.
- Method Precision:
The precision of an analytical method is the degree of agreement among individual test results when the procedure is applied repeatability to multiple samplings of homogenous sample. It is usually expressed as the standard deviation and the relative standard deviation.
Test Procedure:
Prepare the six samples of same batch as per standard analytical procedure and spike impurity G at specification limit level. Un-spiked sample shall be analyzed to identify the known impurity in sample. Obtained known impurity in un-spiked sample to be subtracted in spiked sample to calculate the actually spiked known amount of impurity. Records the area response of impurity obtained in test solution and calculates the % impurity, mean, standard deviation and % relative standard deviation of six samples in tabular manner as given below.
Table 6.0 Method precision results by 1st analyst
Sr. No. | Sample wt. (mg) | Impurity G | |
Peak Area | Impurity % | ||
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 | |||
Mean | |||
SD | |||
%RSD |
Acceptance criteria:
% RSD of known, unknown and total impurity content should be not more than the limits specified below.
Result observed Limit for %RSD
Between 0.11 and 0.99 % 15.0%
Greater than 1.0% 10.0%
Impurity content below 0.10% should not be considered for % RSD.
- Intermediate Precision ( Ruggedness ):
Intermediate precision expresses within laboratory variation with different analysts or equipment or different column/same column on different days using same batch of drug product as per method of analysis.
The system precision is the closeness of agreement between the responses of detector. It is usually expressed as the standard deviation (SD) or the relative standard deviation (RSD).
Standard solution shall be prepared as per method of analysis and six replicate injections to be injected in sequence and recorded the area response of main analyte peak and calculate the % RSD for area and retention time.
Table 7.0 System Precision- Repeatability of Standard Injections
Sr. No. | Naproxen | |
Peak Area | Retention time (min.) | |
1 | ||
2 | ||
3 | ||
4 | ||
5 | ||
6 | ||
Mean | ||
SD | ||
% RSD |
Acceptance Criteria:
% RSD for peak area and retention time of naproxen in six replicate injection of reference solution (a) should be NMT 5.0 % and 1.0 % respectively.
Test Procedure:
Prepare the six samples of same batch as per standard analytical procedure and spike impurity G at specification limit level. Un-spiked sample shall be analyzed to identify the known impurity in sample. Obtained known impurity in un-spiked sample to be subtracted in spiked sample to calculate the actually spiked known amount of impurity. Records the area response of impurity obtained in test solution and calculates the % impurity, mean, standard deviation and % relative standard deviation of six samples in tabular manner as given below.
Table 8.0 Intermediate (ruggedness) precision results by 2nd analyst
Sr. No. | Sample wt. (mg) | Impurity G | |
Peak Area | Impurity % | ||
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 | |||
Mean | |||
SD | |||
%RSD |
Acceptance criteria:
% RSD of known, unknown and total impurity content should be not more than the limits specified below. Reporting threshold value is 0.2%.
Result observed Limit for %RSD
Between 0.11 and 0.99 % 15.0%
Greater than 1.0% 10.0%
Impurity content below 0.10% should not be considered for %RSD.
Table 9.0 Cumulative results of analyst – I & analyst – II
Sr. No. | Sample wt. (mg) | Impurity G | |
Peak Area | Impurity % | ||
Analyst I | |||
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 | |||
Analyst II | |||
1 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 | |||
Mean | |||
SD | |||
%RSD |
Acceptance criteria:
Pooled % RSD of known, unknown and total impurity content should be not more than the limits specified below.
Result observed Limit for %RSD
Between 0.11 and 0.99 % 15.0%
Greater than 1.0% 10.0%
Impurity content below 0.10% should not be considered for %RSD.
- System Suitability:
System suitability tests are based on concept that the equipment, electronics, analytical operations and sample to be analyzed, system suitability test provide the added assurance that on specific occasion the method is given accurate and precise results.
The system suitability should be as per below mention criteria in Table.
Table 10.0: System Suitability Criteria
Sr. No. | System Suitability Criteria | Limit |
1. | The resolution between Impurity G and Naproxen. | Minimum 3.0 |
2. | Area % RSD of Naproxen in reference solution (a) | NMT – 5.0% |
- Incident/Deviation:
Any incident or deviation observed during analytical method verification should be recorded and investigate as per SOP.
- Summary/Conclusion/recommendation:
Final conclusion should be drawn from analytical method verification for its use to analyze the enantiomeric purity of Naproxen Ph. Eur. by European pharmacopoeia procedure.
Summary of verification report shall be prepare and accordingly conclusion and recommendation to be given.
Abbreviations:
REL : Related substance
VERP : Verification Protocol
SD : Standard deviation
HPLC : High performance liquid chromatography
DAD : diode-array detector
RT : Retention Time
mL : Milliliter
mg : Milligram
min. : Minutes
QA : Quality Assurance
QC : Quality Control
% : Percentage
ºC : Degree centigrade
µl : Microlitre
EP/Ph.Eur : Europeian Pharmacopoeia
RSD : Relative standard deviation
NLT : Not less than
NMT : Not more than
Revision History :
Revision No. | Details of changes | Reason for change |
00 | Nil | New Document |